Your message dated Wed, 04 Jul 2018 11:05:28 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#891216: fixed in debian-policy 4.1.5.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #891216,
regarding Requre d-devel consultation for epoch bump
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
891216: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=891216
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.1.3.0

We had another thread on debian-devel recently, in which it once again
became evident that epochs are misunderstood.  Epoch bumps should be
rare and there are often better solutions.  I suggest that we should
ask people to consult debian-devel.

Also we should encourage the +really convention rather than epoch
bumps.

Concretely,

    epoch

        This is a single (generally small) unsigned integer. It may be
        omitted, in which case zero is assumed. If it is omitted then the
        upstream_version may not contain any colons.
  -
  -     It is provided to allow mistakes in the version numbers of older
  -     versions of a package, and also a s previous version numbering
  -     schemes, to be left behind.
  -     package
  +
  +     Epochs can help when the upstream version numbering scheme
  +     changes, but they must be used with care.  In Debian, please
  +     consult debian-devel when changing the epoch.

  ...

    Note that the purpose of epochs is
  - to allow us to leave behind mistakes in version numbering, and
    to cope with situations where the
  + upstream
    version numbering scheme changes
  + and to allow us to leave behind serious mistakes
    .
  +
  + Epochs should not usually be used when
  + a package needs to be rolled back (use the +really convention)
  + or to
    cope with
  - It is not intended to
    version numbers containing strings of letters which the package
    management system cannot interpret (such as ALPHA or pre-), or with
    silly orderings.
  +
  + If you think that increasing the epoch is the right situation,
  + please consult debian-devel before doing so
  + (even in experimental).

Ian.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: debian-policy
Source-Version: 4.1.5.0

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
debian-policy, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sean Whitton <[email protected]> (supplier of updated debian-policy 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2018 11:49:10 +0100
Source: debian-policy
Binary: debian-policy
Architecture: source
Version: 4.1.5.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Policy Editors <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Sean Whitton <[email protected]>
Description:
 debian-policy - Debian Policy Manual and related documents
Closes: 787816 864615 880920 891216 901160
Changes:
 debian-policy (4.1.5.0) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Policy: Update section 4.1, "Standards conformance"
     Wording: Ian Jackson <[email protected]>
     Seconded: Sean Whitton <[email protected]>
     Seconded: Holger Levsen <[email protected]>
     Closes: #901160
   * Policy: Require d-devel consultation for each epoch bump
     Wording: Ian Jackson <[email protected]>
     Seconded: Sean Whitton <[email protected]>
     Seconded: Paul Gevers <[email protected]>
     Closes: #891216
   * Policy: Document Rules-Requires-Root
     Wording: Niels Thykier <[email protected]>
     Wording: Guillem Jover <[email protected]>
     Wording: Sean Whitton <[email protected]>
     Seconded: Paul Gevers <[email protected]>
     Closes: #880920
   * Policy: Update version of POSIX standard for shell scripts
     Wording: Sean Whitton <[email protected]>
     Seconded: Simon McVittie <[email protected]>
     Seconded: Julien Cristau <[email protected]>
     Seconded: Gunnar Wolf <[email protected]>
     Closes: #864615
   * Policy: Update version of FHS from 2.3 to 3.0
     Wording: Simon McVittie <[email protected]>
     Seconded: Sean Whitton <[email protected]>
     Seconded: Julien Cristau <[email protected]>
     Closes: #787816
   * Add reference link to section 4.1 to section 5.6.11.
Checksums-Sha1:
 bd2f88c5142e649785c05651cbd6d6d1e09073e6 2001 debian-policy_4.1.5.0.dsc
 ca762a93462cf924cddf392e749d3394350b8eda 461188 debian-policy_4.1.5.0.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 701e93245119f200b328f946f48d1bb2de64acd54efccb17fbd0facd40729112 2001 
debian-policy_4.1.5.0.dsc
 3de86786b2c33b6ef914f1bd02c74bbf640b6b951ff9ce6b9c651ce64a5842a6 461188 
debian-policy_4.1.5.0.tar.xz
Files:
 d9a472e6342de171b25689a9ebdeb885 2001 doc optional debian-policy_4.1.5.0.dsc
 f6f7cdbea663f05f6bd57e2f44ca05bc 461188 doc optional 
debian-policy_4.1.5.0.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=7Eep
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to