On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 02:51:55PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > [...]
Looks ok at first read, maybe a little bit too much normative. One minor comment: > (i) a failure of the build, in which case the additional packages > MUST be declared in Build-Conflicts); As we talked before, that's usually a required workaround but often not the best solution. I would try to complement the quoted paragraph with some note or advice saying "try to make it compatible so that build-conflicts are not really required" or something alike. Thanks.
