On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 08:37:13PM +0700, Judit Foglszinger wrote: > Wouldn't it be more advisable to write something like > "in case you fail to authenticate to the NM site or have other issues > to open the retirement/return process yourself, contact front desk" > instead of keeping the former more cumbersome way of retirement alife?
Yes, I think that would do (even if it would require a round trip for
people wanting to retire).
> Also, what about the gpg key?
> Are people asked to prove they still control their key?
> If so, in which way?
Good questions indeed… In the very few cases of returnees I saw during
my little time I have in FD, I noticed two cases:
* people whom their old key was still perfectly valid → just accept it
* people whom their old key was not trustable anymore → require another
DD to vouch for it (i.e. "yes, this gpg key really belongs to the
same person that used to be behind this Debian uid")
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
