Le ven. 3 févr. 2023 à 18:27, Jelmer Vernooij <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Package: debian-policy > Severity: wishlist > > Policy currently describes Vcs-* headers as something optional, but stops > to > endorse a particular Vcs. > > At this point, it seems uncontroversial to encourage use of Vcs-Git > specifically here. Apart from technical arguments, it's the vcs that the > majority of packages in the archive uses - and thus will have the better > tooling, less of a learning curve for other contributors, etc. > > There are very few holdouts of other vcses in the archive. I count 62 > (ignoring those with an alioth URL): > > * 26 on Svn > * 3 on Cvs > * 4 on Hg (2 are hg/hg-buildpackage) > * 39 on bzr (half of these are actually bzr and related packages, which I > maintain) > Could this remark also address the fact that in most cases, Vcs-Git == Vcs-Browser, and thus Vcs-Browser is irrelevant ?
