Hi Luca, Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org> writes:
>> On Sun, 2023-06-25 at 18:51 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: >> > Patch attached and pushed to >> > https://salsa.debian.org/bluca/policy/-/commits/mandatory_units?ref_type=hea >> >> There is one part I think should not be changed: we currently don't >> require integration with service management at all. That should >> probably not be changed. So please consider reverting >> >> +--- >> | Packages that include system services must include ``systemd`` service >> +--- >> >> to the original >> >> +--- >> | Packages that include system services should include ``systemd`` service >> +--- > > How about: > > -Packages that include system services should include ``systemd`` service > -units to start or stop those services. > +Packages shipping system services should integrate with service management. > +If they choose to do so, they must include ``systemd`` service units to start > +or stop those services. I take care of packages that does not meet the proposed policy. And I don't have a systemd test environment. I am curious what is the recommended way to go forward. - upload a generator-converted .service without any test; - set low-NMU to encourage interested party to upload a .service; - leave the lack-of-systemd-service bug open until some one submit a patch or a merge request; - you name it. Cheers, Benda
