On 15/07/25 at 12:03 +0200, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > +1 to clarifying the DELAYED queue section. Please also include an > example dcut command on how to remove a package from the DELAYED queue > if the maintainer does not want to have it.
Right > Personally I would much rather see a contribution being submitted to > my packages as a Merge Request on Salsa, than as a NMU via DELAYED. If > I am active, I can immediately engage in discussion about the change. > If I am really busy I can just merge it without discussion, or comment > that I am fine with it but don't have time to review deeper. If I am > completely missing, I would be fine if somebody posted a MR and then > after a few weeks went and merged it themselves and uploaded. This > would still feel more collaborative than noticing a new package > version as NMU in DELAYED. Does this resonate with others? Maybe it would be better to focus this bug for discussing how to improve the section of developers-reference that describes DELAYED queue handling, and move the discussion about MR-based workflows elsewhere? We can improve the current process and discuss a new process at the same time (in different fora), and drop the current process when the new process is ready and widely accepted. Lucas
