debian-policy  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh Marcus Brinkmann
  • Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh Zack Weinberg
  • Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh Marcus Brinkmann
  • Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh Zack Weinberg
  • Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh Marcus Brinkmann
  • Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh Zack Weinberg
  • Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh Patrik Hagglund
  • Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh Steve Greenland
  • Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh Zack Weinberg
  • Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh Patrik Hagglund
  • Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh Zack Weinberg
  • Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh Patrik Hagglund
• Processed: policy proposal cleanup Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Re: Processed: policy proposal cleanup Julian Gilbey
• Bug#87510: I second this proposal Adrian Bunk
  • Bug#87510: I second this proposal Chris Waters
  • Bug#87510: I second this proposal Anthony Towns
  • Bug#87510: I second this proposal Peter Palfrader
  • Bug#87510: I second this proposal Julian Gilbey
  • Bug#87510: I second this proposal Anthony Towns
  • Bug#87510: I second this proposal Julian Gilbey
  • Bug#87510: I second this proposal Ben Collins
  • Bug#87510: I second this proposal Julian Gilbey
• Re: woody release task needs help: package priorities Adrian Bunk
  • Re: woody release task needs help: package priorities Adam Di Carlo
  • Re: woody release task needs help: package priorities Arto Jantunen
• 91252 accepted Branden Robinson
  • Processed: 91252 accepted Debian Bug Tracking System
• CVS jdg: * Finished chapter 11 debian-policy
• Bug#97755: [PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Joey Hess
  • Bug#97755: Acknowledgement ([PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system) Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Bas Zoetekouw
  • Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Anthony Towns
  • Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Charles Briscoe-Smith
  • Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Anthony Towns
  • Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
  • Bug#97755: [AMENDMENT 17/05/2001] eliminating task packages; new task system Joey Hess
  • Processed: [AMENDMENT 17/05/2001] eliminating task packages; new task system Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#97755 acknowledged by developer ([AMENDMENT 17/05/2001] eliminating task packages; new task system) Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Re: Bug#97755: [PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Manoj Srivastava
  • Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Joey Hess
  • Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Manoj Srivastava
  • Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Anthony Towns
  • Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Manoj Srivastava
  • Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Anthony Towns
  • Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Joey Hess
  • Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Raul Miller
  • Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Manoj Srivastava
  • Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Manoj Srivastava
  • Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Adam Heath
  • Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Anthony Towns
  • Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Alexander Hvostov
  • Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Anthony Towns
  • Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Raul Miller
  • Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Anthony Towns
  • Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Raul Miller
  • Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Anthony Towns
  • Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Raul Miller
  • Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Julian Gilbey
  • Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Anthony Towns
  • Re: Bug#97755: [PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Anton Zinoviev
  • Re: Bug#97755: [PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Bug#97755: [PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Anton Zinoviev
  • Re: Bug#97755: [PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Richard Braakman
  • Bug#97755 acknowledged by developer (Bug#97755: fixed in debian-policy 3.5.7.0) Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#97755: marked as done ([PENDING AMENDMENT 17/05/2001] eliminating task packages; new task system) Debian Bug Tracking System
• CVS jdg: * Improving 11.1 -- 11.6 debian-policy
• CVS jdg: * Improved 10.1.2 example (fixes bug#92744) debian-policy
• Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? Adrian Bunk
  • Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? Wichert Akkerman
  • Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? Julian Gilbey
  • Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? Marco d'Itri
  • Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? Julian Gilbey
  • Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? Santiago Vila
  • Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? Junichi Uekawa
  • Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? Richard Braakman
  • Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? John Galt
  • Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? Richard Braakman
  • Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? Steve Greenland
  • Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? Adrian Bunk
  • Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? Colin Watson
  • Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? Adrian Bunk
• Bug#32263: Proposal: Splitting cgi-bin Brian White
  • Bug#32263: Proposal: Splitting cgi-bin Peter Palfrader
  • Bug#32263: Proposal: Splitting cgi-bin Brian White
  • Bug#32263: Proposal: Splitting cgi-bin Wichert Akkerman
  • Bug#32263: Proposal: Splitting cgi-bin Brian White
  • Bug#32263: Proposal: Splitting cgi-bin Wichert Akkerman
• 7.5.1 Overwriting files in other packages Karl M. Hegbloom
  • Re: 7.5.1 Overwriting files in other packages Seth Arnold
  • Re: 7.5.1 Overwriting files in other packages Brian May
  • Re: 7.5.1 Overwriting files in other packages Julian Gilbey
  • Re: 7.5.1 Overwriting files in other packages Wichert Akkerman
• Bug#91257: I always forget SOMETHING Branden Robinson
• this proposal becoming an amendment Branden Robinson
  • Processed: this proposal becoming an amendment Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#91257: seconding this Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
• Software Engineers, Software Developers. Opportunity in Luxembourg Alex Jacobs
• ATTN: font package maintainers Branden Robinson
• Bug#97072: make amendment Anthony Towns
  • Processed: make amendment Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#97072: make amendment Anthony Towns
  • Processed: Re: Bug#97072: make amendment Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#97072: [PROPOSED 2001/05/11] correct policy's comments on standards-version Anthony Towns
  • Bug#97072: PROPOSED 2001/05/11] correct policy's comments on standards-version Steve Greenland
  • Bug#97072: PROPOSED 2001/05/11] correct policy's comments on standards-version Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
  • Bug#97072: PROPOSED 2001/05/11] correct policy's comments on standards-version Manoj Srivastava
  • Bug#97072: marked as done ([ACCEPTED 2001/05/18] correct policy's comments on standards-version) Debian Bug Tracking System
• reminder: menu icons should be 32x32 or smaller! Chris Waters
  • Re: reminder: menu icons should be 32x32 or smaller! Wolfgang Sourdeau
  • Re: reminder: menu icons should be 32x32 or smaller! Michael Piefel
  • Re: reminder: menu icons should be 32x32 or smaller! Bernhard R. Link
  • Re: reminder: menu icons should be 32x32 or smaller! Wolfgang Sourdeau
  • RE: reminder: menu icons should be 32x32 or smaller! Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• Re: Bug#96458: xv is NOT a native Debian package (fwd) Adrian Bunk
  • Re: Bug#96458: xv is NOT a native Debian package (fwd) Joey Hess
  • Re: Bug#96458: xv is NOT a native Debian package (fwd) Philippe Troin
  • Re: Bug#96458: xv is NOT a native Debian package (fwd) Manoj Srivastava
  • Re: Bug#96458: xv is NOT a native Debian package (fwd) Adrian Bunk
• Use of Debian offical logo Hisham Ismail
  • Re: Use of Debian offical logo Colin Watson
• tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation) Joey Hess
  • Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation) Arthur Korn
  • Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation) Anthony Towns
  • Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation) Joey Hess
  • Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation) Branden Robinson
  • Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation) Joey Hess
  • Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation) Branden Robinson
  • Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation) Joey Hess
  • Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation) Anthony Towns
  • Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation) Joey Hess
  • Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation) Anthony Towns
• Bug#96873: virtual-package names, ladspa-host and ladspa-plugin Junichi Uekawa
  • Bug#96873: virtual-package names, ladspa-host and ladspa-plugin Junichi Uekawa
  • Bug#96873: virtual-package names, ladspa-host and ladspa-plugin Anand Kumria
  • Bug#96873: Info received (was virtual-package names, ladspa-host and ladspa-plugin) Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#96873: virtual-package names, ladspa-host and ladspa-plugin Junichi Uekawa
• "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Marcelo E. Magallon
  • Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Jason Gunthorpe
  • Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Marcelo E. Magallon
  • Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Branden Robinson
  • Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Marcelo E. Magallon
  • Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Josip Rodin
  • Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Wichert Akkerman
  • Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Josip Rodin
  • Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Wichert Akkerman
  • Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Josip Rodin
  • Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Herbert Xu
  • Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Josip Rodin
  • Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Herbert Xu
  • Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Josip Rodin
  • Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Herbert Xu
  • Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Josip Rodin
  • Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Herbert Xu
  • Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Seth Arnold
  • Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Josip Rodin
  • Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Herbert Xu
  • Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Josip Rodin
  • Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Herbert Xu
  • Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Josip Rodin
  • Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Herbert Xu
  • Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Josip Rodin
  • Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Anthony Towns
  • Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Manoj Srivastava
  • Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Wichert Akkerman
• CVS jdg: * Done chapter 10 now debian-policy
• Special init.d scripts Julian Gilbey
  • RE: Special init.d scripts Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
  • Re: Special init.d scripts Seth Arnold
  • Re: Special init.d scripts Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
• Bug#96629: 3.2 and 2.3 package naming not synchronized Egon Willighagen
  • Bug#96629: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] synchronize sections 3.2 and 2.3 on package naming) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#96597: native packages should be required to contain changelogs Sam Hartman
• Finishing the FHS transition Adrian Bunk
  • Re: Finishing the FHS transition Oliver Elphick
  • Re: Finishing the FHS transition Chris Waters
  • Re: Finishing the FHS transition Arthur Korn
  • menu and FHS (was Re: Finishing the FHS transition) Chris Waters
  • Re: Finishing the FHS transition Adrian Bunk
  • Re: Finishing the FHS transition Marcus Brinkmann
  • Re: Finishing the FHS transition Steve Greenland
  • Re: Finishing the FHS transition Julian Gilbey
  • Re: Finishing the FHS transition Martin Michlmayr
  • Re: Finishing the FHS transition Chris Waters
  • Re: Finishing the FHS transition Adrian Bunk
  • Re: Finishing the FHS transition Anthony Towns
  • Re: Finishing the FHS transition Adrian Bunk
  • Re: Finishing the FHS transition Anthony Towns
  • Re: Finishing the FHS transition Chris Waters
  • Re: Finishing the FHS transition Anthony Towns
  • Re: Finishing the FHS transition Manoj Srivastava
  • Re: Finishing the FHS transition Seth Arnold
  • Re: Finishing the FHS transition Manoj Srivastava
  • Re: Finishing the FHS transition Joey Hess
  • Re: Finishing the FHS transition Chris Waters
  • Re: Finishing the FHS transition Adam Heath
  • Re: Finishing the FHS transition Adam Heath
  • Re: Finishing the FHS transition Bas Zoetekouw

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]