> If it still crashes, I would appreciate some regression testing, that > is going backward in the bk snapshots to point out which one precisely > introduced the problem. Hey Ben.
I've tested kernel 2.6.12-rc1-bk5 plain and 2.6.12-rc1-bk5 with the your patches (plus the last one) and in both cases it crashes when I try to start X. One of those times I was testing, I forgot to apply your last patch (this one: replace "lis r4,0xfff0" for "li r4,0") and when I tried to wake up after resume, it crashes. After that I've made the change and the cycle resume/wakeup works correctly. I tell you this because maybe it can be useful. By the way, I've tested too the 2.6.10 kernel plain and all works properly (resume/wakeup, X, ...) Now I don't know if it will be more useful for you if I continue testing the 2.6.12-rc1-bk4 and below, or try 2.6.11 plain and then going up. What do you think about it? Thanks. Esteban. -- Keep it soulful and spread love! "Ask and it will given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you." (Mathew 7:7) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
