Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I know, but this oneliner is incorrect. It can't be correct, no way. > That is very strange, and that's what I'm trying to figure out. Can you > try instead changing the start address of the flush from 0xfff00000 to 0 > by changing the L1 flush bit initalisation from lis r4,0xfff0 to li > r4,0 ?
This fixes the problem. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstra�e 5, 90409 N�rnberg, Germany Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
