On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 06:55:24PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: > > pardon me, but is there not a standard that must be met by all packages? > As it is lam-6.1-2.deb is far away from this standard. It is just a > collection of useless files, since the library and the binaries are not > there. And it will take quite long till it 's been fully ported since > there is a lot of i386-specific assembly code in there. Personally I > prefer not to have such a misguiding package at all..
It shouldn't be there. I don't even see one - is it new in the past few days? LAM is a very processor-specific package; MPI on powerpc is flaky at the very best. > PS. Is there anyone that is proficient with perl? Drop me a mail please. What's the problem? Dan /--------------------------------\ /--------------------------------\ | Daniel Jacobowitz |__| CMU, CS class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer __ Part-Time Systems Programmer | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | \--------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/
