-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
>> ipfwadm what was I thinking? Isn't ipfwadm supposed to be superseded by ipfwchains, as it works with 2.0.x kernels but ipfwchains works with 2.1.x and 2.2.x kernels? >Yes, the damn sym-link bug. hm, I admit I never heard of this bug. what is it? >Thanks for your work! Well, I want to prove my worth, so it's natural :) PS. I forgot to say, that I am in the process of doing an NMU release (both source and binary) of scilab 2.4.1. The existing one is 2.4 which does NOT compile ok on ppc -at least not without patches. - -- Konstantinos Margaritis -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBNvazLPalfJok8qABAQH1MAQAi0QM00SuUWNJmLoe00Rb9kicNPWivPWc f+CNvBuRLVFw/0w7An/TyUbkC3i9BTape0ozxReR5RSEj8JEYfv6aUEgaN3yIKt6 rG2mQHYsA74vmRZ/hL3cKBatwi7ROe2IuZtiRbXugcBwvpDv9rRyNDuAViikjSLI /k1sqthhyXk= =HGvN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
