Ouch. Okay, I'll delete that from incoming and will fix it. Sorry, the problem with NMUs is that we aren't familiar about every detail of the package. I missed the copy of another binary, which I was under the impression was built.
I'll get a fixed version probably Monday evening. Thanks for your time. It's not waisted on me. Peter Matt Porter wrote: > On Fri, Oct 15, 1999 at 12:39:17PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > [I don't subscribe to this list. Please CC replies to me.] > > > > I just uploaded libforms0.89_0.89-2 to master's incoming. > > It's supposed to build on powerpc (it's the only non-i386 we > > currently have the non-source library for). > > > > Would someone mind downloading the source, trying it out (it's a > > drop-in replacement for libforms0.88), perhaps even try > > recompiling some simple XForms app with it (xcolmix for example), > > and uploading a binary powerpc package? > > The source package has a couple of problems that I see already: > > 1) debian/control needs to have architecture=any instead of i386 > > 2) The libforms-bin rule copies binaries from DESIGN which are only > i386. The DESIGN directory really should be laid out like the > FORMS directory with arch-specific subdirs. Another option would > be to not provide libforms-bin is we can't have powerpc binaries > of those tools but this is undesirable and should be fixed in the > upstream package. > > -- > Matt Porter > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > This is Linux Country. On a quiet night, you can hear Windows reboot.
