On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 09:22:48AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 21, 1999 at 10:23:10AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > > > On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > > > > > > Notice this are all debian patches, not only the one for powerpc. They > > > > are cut > > > > in a lot of small patches. > > > > > > Right, but the PPC patches are in there someplace then? Right now my > > > 3.3.5's have an accel glitch on ATI (i'm wondering if my patch around the > > > regb/etc stuff was wrong) which the debian FBDev doesn't show. Reminds > > > me, which compiler was used on those rpms? 2.95.x ? (I see 2.95.2-0pre3 or > > > 4 is out pkg wise..) > > > > huh, yes i think, perhaps the version before that. Does the X server not say > > things about that when you ask him ? I compiled it some weeks ago. I used > > the > > new glibc also. > > Hmm. Can you double check this? I'm using glibc 2.1.3 snapshot & 2.95.2 > pre-release. Right now we've got the same patches that affect "fbdev" > (grep -l fbdev *) but the current debian X server doesn't have this minor > glitch (rage pro & blackbox i think).
Current stuff is : glibc 2.1.2 and gcc 2.95.1. But i am not sure that that was used when i compiled it. Friendly, Sven LUTHER
