> > From what I've heard, sparc(64) support in stock is pretty good, m68k too, > > Not m68k AFAIK. As long as I've known about it, it's always needed patches to > even build, let alone run. At least for Amigas, dunno about Macs (the subarch > issue again).
Macs?? Need even more patches. And they keep a separate development tree
around for this (which has accelerated the development considerably).
Michael
