On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 01:10:33PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 06:48:53PM +0100, Michel D�nzer wrote: > > There's been a big reorganisation. woody is no longer called unstable (sid > > is) > > but testing. It's been reverted to the packages from potato and will be > > filled > > up with packages from unstable which don't have (too many) critical bugs. I > > guess it's again a problem of the PPC autobuilder lagging (if there is even > > any for testing yet?). > > OK, this one I -refuse- to take the blame for! :) > > That's not how testing works. You don't build for testing; you build > for unstable. Packages don't move into testing until they have > sufficiently few RC bugs and build for all released architectures for > which a previous version built - that means that not much is going into > testing until we get glibc 2.2 built on arm and m68k, which should be > soon.
So people tracking woody previously should put now unstable or sid in their apt source file ? Friendly, Sven Luther
