A bit of scrounging though Google and this appears to be due to one of my GNOME/xml packages not being up to scratch. I've not had any luck yet working out which one. Any ideas people?
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001 12:41:55 Craige McWhirter wrote: > I had a bit of trouble with Evolution. Anyone have quick pointers on the > following: > > oafd: error while loading shared libraries: oafd: undefined symbol: > xmlCheckVersion > > ** CRITICAL **: file oaf-activate.c: line 279 (oaf_activate_from_id): assertion > `ac' failed. > > This is the result of running evolution after d/ling it and all it's > dependencies from Sid. As far as I can tell my Oaf libs are the latest (in Sid). Am I > sufferring the "the joys of Sid" or have I perhaps missed something fundamental? > > On Tue, 20 Feb 2001 03:13:37 Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > Robert Ramiega wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 11:47:09AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > > > > If nautilus works, does this mean evolution will compile? > > > > > > > > No, because there's no Debian evolution package. :-( > > > Well to be completely honest there is no oficial debian package... On > > > helixcode.com (or whatever it's called now) there are i386 and source > Debian > > > packages. > > > > Actually, now there is an official Debian package too. I compiled yesterday > > morning and uploaded around 1 PM (U.S. Eastern time), and was in the archive > by > > 4 AM (when my mirror updates). > > > > I've done no testing except to make sure that it starts properly, and that > > nautilus does too with the new bonobo... > > > > Evolution is here! Test and enjoy! > > > > -Adam P.
