Hi, I have a working gcc HEAD build from about 2 weeks ago. If you send me some standalone test code, I would be happy to test it.
I also have 2.95.3 too and will test with both. Just create a main with a call to printtrace and have printtrace print all the values and just return and I will test it for you. Take care, Kevin On Friday 23 February 2001 16:59, Stephen Turner wrote: > On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Kevin B. Hendricks wrote: > > > > Here is a quick and dirty way to test. Move both double parameters to the > > beginning of the function and caller and the problem should go away. > > > > Another solution is to include a "dummy" int variable in both the caller > > and the function right before the double parameter "unit". That dummy will > > fill a stack slot and force any messed up double alignment issue to become > > moot. > > > > The second fix got it past the call to printtree(). Then it crashed when > calling another function, printcols(), which I fixed with the first fix. > This allowed it to run without crashing, but the resultant output was > obviously wrong, with what could have been a related bug. > > Anyway, I think this proves that your hypothesis was correct. > > > If either of those workarounds work, then please pass all of this info to > > Franz Sirl's attention on the [email protected] site and he can use it to > > track down the messed up code. It the workarounds fix things, this is a > > definite bug > > > > You said these were mostly fixed in the 2.95.3 series. The original bug > filer is using 2.95.2. Should I still file a bug? Or has someone got a > nightly build or something that they could test it on first, in case it's > already been fixed? > > -- > Stephen Turner http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~sret1/ > Statistical Laboratory, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge, CB3 0WB, England > "Your account can only be used for a single internet session at any one > time and for no more than 24 hours in any one day." (NTL terms of use)
