On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 03:50:42PM -0700, Matt Brubeck wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, John Hughes wrote: > > > Ok, so I have pretty much figured out that the destination kernel is > > not the one on kernel.org. So, where is the home of the "Stable PPC > > Linux Kernel"? > > It is on kernel.org, but it is in the v2.2 directory. > > PowerPC patches are being fed into Alan and Linus's kernel sources, but > this is a slow process. In the 2.2 series, it took until about 2.2.13 (?) > for the mainstream kernel to work reasonably. By 2.2.16 the kernel.org > sources were perfectly stable on PowerPC, and they still are in 2.2.19. > > Eventually Linus's 2.4 kernel will work on PowerPC, and it will become the > preferred stable kernel for end users. > > For now, 2.4 is still "in development" on PPC, and is only recommended for > kernel hackers or for users who need features not in 2.2.19. There are > other PPC trees that may have less experimental work than Ben's, but these > are still developmental: >
So, which tree is best for headless oldworlds that only need (scsi|ide), iptables, QoS, and adv routing features?
