On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 06:43:42PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > I have to second Bastien, Its right under say a celleron 300a for > > performance....maybe....and thats a big maybe. That said, its still plenty
huh, on what do you base this affirmation ? or do you compare it with an overclocked celeron 300 to 450 or something such ? or is it a desktop system with a faster system, faster disks, etc, ... or are you using intel optimized programs for benchmarking ? comparing a 500Mhz G3 to a 300MHz Celeron hardly seems right to me, but then i did not really do any tests. Friendly, Sven Luther
