On 13 Aug, this message from Mike Fedyk echoed through cyberspace: > On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 09:25:29AM -0700, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: >> What kernel is recommended for use on the tibook? I've currently got >> 2.4.7 from mvista, and the kerboard is hosed and the hardware clock >> doesn't work. >> > > Let me ask this question also, but for oldworld machines, specifically, > 7200, 6500, and oldworld g3. > > Will kernel.org ppc 2.4 kernels be ok for these systems? The systems I > would be running would mostly be headless routers, file & print servers, and > such.
Either kernel.org 2.2 tree, or the bk or benh 2.4 trees. 2.4 kernel.org isn't ready yet. If you want to keep your servers running quietly in a corner without touching them, 2.2 might be your best bet. Since you will not need all the fancy new hardware support in 2.4, 2.2 is your best stable solution. It's a bit slower than 2.4, but that shouldn't matter for your use. Cheers Michel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michel Lanners | " Read Philosophy. Study Art. 23, Rue Paul Henkes | Ask Questions. Make Mistakes. L-1710 Luxembourg | email [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cpu.lu/~mlan | Learn Always. "
