Sven wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 10:14:57AM -0700, Laurent de Segur wrote: > > What you are saying about ReiserFS is really unfortunate. When I > > read the archive, there is no question that XFS is a lot more > > reliable than ReiserFS. On the other hand, It seems that the Linux > > community is promoting heavily ReiserFS vs XFS/JFS, and that seems > > totally contradictory with the feedback I got so far. > > But then, i have one of those 40 GB IBM drives that might, or might > not, have problems, with my previous disk, i had no problem, but i > died during a apt-get run, not sure if it is related to reiserfs or > something as i just did upgrade kernels, before that, i had no problem > with > reiserfs,
Neither did I until it decided to suddenly eat all the data on that partition. (It also happened during a dist-upgrade, but I guess that's just coincidence ;) I have no reason to believe there is a problem with the disk. -- Earthling Michel D�nzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast
