> (I suspect you say 'Xinerama' when you mean 'multihead', which isn't
> equivalent)

I understand the difference between multihead and Xinerama - the original
poster asked about Xinerama and I asked whether that'a actually supported
yet (by way of multihead in the underlying driver). 

> > (this would imply UseFBDev probably?). 
> 
> Depends if the implementation of the two heads is done in the
> framebuffer device or in the X server driver.

Yep. The chances of me ever mucking with the X server driver are zero, the
chances of mucking with the fb code are just slim (and that wouldn't be on
r128 anyway, just scouting out some ideas).

        Michael

Reply via email to