On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 03:02:35PM -0700, Brad Boyer wrote: > On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 11:11:07AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 10:13:07AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > >On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 06:34:45PM -0700, Brad Boyer wrote: > > >> Yup. The problem is that an HFS filesystem refers to allocation > > >> blocks with an unsigned 16 bit integer, so while the specification > > >> technically allows 2^32 different files, only 2^16 can actually > > >> be taking up any space, and there are a few system files taking > > >> up some of that, so in practical terms, it's a little smaller. > > > > > >I suppose HFS+ fixes this kind of problems, is it not ? > > > > Pass. I know (almost) nothing about HFS and HFS+. I believe that we > > need the disc to be an HFS/ISO9660 hybrid for powermacs to boot > > it. Yes? > > The allocation block problem is one of the big fixes in HFS+. It uses > a 32 bit int to specify blocks. Other improvements were longer filenames, > unicode, and UNIX style permissions. An HFS volume is the easiest way > to boot most powermacs, since the defaults assume HFS.
A bit like the FAT16 to F1T32 move on dos/windows ? Friendly, Sven Luther
