On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 06:03:39PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 10:53:56 +0100, Sven Luther composed: > > On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 03:24:00AM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 16:07:45 +0100, Sven Luther composed: > > only for stable (woody) and old-stable (potato), but the later will be > > going away after a time. > > > > Unstable get security fixes trough new uploads, and depend mainly on the > > disponibility of the package maintainer. Testing gets security uploads > > when the unstable package is ready to enter testing, which can be > > delayed for many reasons, like the 6 month delay due to glibc. > > > > There can be uploads to testing-proposed-upates, but i think not many > > people will do that. > > > > Friendly, > > > > Sven Luther > > really? whoah. well, i remember when potato was the curretn stable, and > security for testing (if you were tracking it) was a good idea. did that > change, was i deluded?
I may be wrong, but i don't think there ever was security for testing. Sure people may have thought it was a great idea, but if the security team don't implement it, it is not worth it. That said, i may be wrong, so please check for yourself. Also for anyone running testing, be prepared for a huge upgrade nextly. Friendly, Sven Luther
