On 31/12/2003 at 12:02, Michael Schmitz wrote: > I'm seeing pretty much the same thing. Wasn't happening in -test11. > I'll compare -ben3 and -test11 to see if something happened to the > sleep code.
With 2.6.0-ben1 and 2.6.0-ben2 didn't happen either. > (Another list to report this would be linuxppc-dev, but Ben reads this > list as well) Fine. I'm going to lurk there for a while. On 31/12/2003 at 12:38, Michael Schmitz wrote: > These are warnings only (see lines 568 and 2851 in vt.c). Seems like > the wakeup code gives up the console semaphore too early. I see. Thanks for the fast replies :-). Greetings -- Kiko Please do not reply to the sender address of this email; due to spam and Windows (TM) worms, everything not comming from the list is "stored" in /dev/null. Put menorqui in the user part to send me anything. Although, I prefer replies sent to the list so that others can benefit from the discussion. Thanks.
