On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 07:48:05PM +0100, Jens Schmalzing wrote: > Hi, > > Sven Luther writes: > > > Well, i usually used to clone the linuxppc_2.4 bitkeeper tree, which had > > nice tags for when the import was being done, but this tree was > > silently obsoleted, and the new linuxppc-2.4 tree used, which lacks such > > tags, especially for the 2.4.24 release, probably because the 2.4.24 > > release was done hastily. > > > Maybe it would be best to forget about 2.4.24, and extract the > > 2.4.23 from the -benh tree, if it is properly tagged, and backport > > the security fix. Or maybe even backport the whole of Marcelo's > > 2.4.23->2.4.24 tag. > > Well, I just browsed through a few of the trees at ppc.bkbits.net, and > at least to me linuxppc_2_4_benh looks nice and clean and perfectly > good for throwing at Debian users.
Yeah, but at what tag will you take the snapshot ? Upto now, you have just taken a random daily snapshot, but for official debian kernels, this will not do. Anyway, Benh promised me a nice 2.4.24 snapshot when he gets time for it, so let's wait for that. Friendly, Sven Luther
