On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 03:48:25AM +0100, Carlos Perell� Mar�n wrote: > El s�b, 31-01-2004 a las 15:57, Jens Schmalzing escribi�: > > Dear Sven, > > > > > I will probably use the -benh tree for future official debian kernels > > > > Please keep in mind that kernel-patch-benh exists already. You should > > at least let it die gracefully if you make it obsolete. Then again, > > I'm beginning to catch up on my work in general and my Debian stuff in > > particular (btw, how are the new mol packages doing on pegasos?), so I > > wouldn't say no if you suggested co-maintainership. > > I don't think kernel-patch-benh should be killed, we should use the main > kernel-source package and apply the needed patches and then compile the > binaries. Just look at kernel-tree packages, It's used to get the needed > packages to build an x86 kernel.
Well, the patches included with it will be part of the kernel-patch-<vers>-poweprc package. Is there any reason at all to duplicate them ? Friendly, Sven Luther
