On Jul 01 2005, sascha brossmann wrote: > on 7/1/05 5:13 PM, Rogério Brito wrote: > > I use the hfsplus module in Linux to get access to HFS+ formatted > > filesystems and it works much better than FAT has ever worked (no little > > limitations of file size etc). > > glad to hear that. while i knew that some progress had been made, i > didn't want to recommend something which i haven't recently & reliably > used myself, though. maybe i should have mentioned that my experience > with hfsplus on linux is slightly dated by now.
Yes, there were some improvements in the last few years. In particular, the output of df isn't confusing anymore, for instance. > @albert: concerning UFS, all i ever heard was recommendations against > using it unless being absolutely forced to because of some legacy > software, so i never considered. Not to mention that there doesn't seem to be just one UFS layoung around and that Linux didn't have good support for UFS the last time I checked (but, again, the Linux driver may have the feature to write on such filesystems not marked "dangerous" anymore). Hope this helps, Rogério. -- Rogério Brito : [EMAIL PROTECTED] : http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito Homepage of the algorithms package : http://algorithms.berlios.de Homepage on freshmeat: http://freshmeat.net/projects/algorithms/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
