On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 07:29:52PM +0100, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 02:43:02PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > Johannes Berg wrote: > > >>> Does this mean that, until the issue is fixed, one can simply "go into > > >>> /usr/share/kernel-package/kernel/arch/ppc.mk or ppc64.mk and edit it so > > Sven, I just saw that actually there is no such file here. You > meant to write instead about the files in > /usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/arches/ > > Correct?
Yeah. Actually, Manoj was searching for testers, or someone with will to play with it. Basically, what needs done is to patch architecture.mk to check the version (either $(version) or $(VERSION).$(PATCHLEVEL).$(SUBLEVEL), example in misc/initrd.mk), and then chose the old ppc/ppc64.mk code for older than 2.6.15, and use the new powerpc.mk code for 2.6.15 and beyond. If you (or someone else) would have time to test this and implement it, and provide a patch against kernel-package, both me and Manoj would highly appreciate, as i presonally fear i will not really have time until january or so. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
