same here... are you trying an airport extreme on a powerbook 12"???
Kasper On 1/19/06, Milan Toth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > well, > > still no luck. kernel 2.6.15 without IEEE80211, with > softmac-snapshot, bcm43xx from checkouted from svn and still > the same problem :( > > Milan > > Emmanuel Galatoulas at Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 11:17:52PM CET wrote: > > Milan Toth wrote: > > > > >no luck :( > > > > > >twoo diferent kernels 2.6.15-rc5 and 2.6.15.1 also your source > > >of bcm43xx and sofmac and no luck. When we can expect official > > >module in kernel? > > > > > >thanks for your help and time Ruben :) > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Milan > > > > i got curious after reading the posts by Ruben so > > I experimented a bit. I built the kernel 2.6.15 without the > > options regarding the ieee82011 modules, > > (here is the diff between my two configurations) > > > > < # Linux kernel version: 2.6.15 > > < # Tue Jan 10 01:36:09 2006 > > --- > > > # Linux kernel version: 2.6.15nowifi > > > # Mon Jan 16 23:37:17 2006 > > 610,611c610,611 > > < CONFIG_IEEE80211_CRYPT_CCMP=m > > < CONFIG_IEEE80211_CRYPT_TKIP=m > > --- > > > # CONFIG_IEEE80211_CRYPT_CCMP is not set > > > # CONFIG_IEEE80211_CRYPT_TKIP is not set > > 1083,1093c1083,1086 > > < # CONFIG_IPW_DEBUG is not set > > < CONFIG_IPW2200=m > > < CONFIG_AIRO=m > > < CONFIG_HERMES=m > > < # CONFIG_APPLE_AIRPORT is not set > > < CONFIG_PLX_HERMES=m > > < CONFIG_TMD_HERMES=m > > < # CONFIG_NORTEL_HERMES is not set > > < CONFIG_PCI_HERMES=m > > < C< CONFIG_PCI_ATMEL=m > > --- > > > # CONFIG_IPW2200 is not set > > > # CONFIG_AIRO is not set > > > # CONFIG_HERMES is not set > > > # CONFIG_ATMEL is not set > > 1098,1099d1090 > > < # CONFIG_PCMCIA_HERMES is not set > > < # CONFIG_PCMCIA_SPECTRUM is not set > > 1101d1091 > > < # CONFIG_PCMCIA_ATMEL is not set > > 1108,1112c1098 > > < CONFIG_HOSTAP=m > > < CONFIG_HOSTAP_FIRMWARE=y > > < CONFIG_HOSTAP_PLX=m > > < CONFIG_HOSTAP_PCI=m > > < CONFIG_HOSTAP_CS=m > > --- > > > # CONFIG_HOSTAP is not set > > > > I emphasise that in both cases i use KERNEL 2.6.15 !!!!!!!! > > (so I can't say about -rc7 or 2.6.15.1!!!) > > > > Then I tried to built bcm43xx first against the kernel's own ieee80211 stuff > > and second against the softmac-snapshot. The result was that in the > > first case > > the module just doesn't build which a little search shows that is due > > not only that > > kernel-source files for ieee* are not identical with those in > > softmac-snapshot! > > For instance: > > > > diff ieee80211_crypt.h > > /usr/src/softmac-snapshot/include/net/ieee80211_crypt.h > > 26c26,28 > > < #include <linux/skbuff.h> > > --- > > > #include <linux/types.h> > > > #include <linux/list.h> > > > #include <asm/atomic.h> > > 31a34,36 > > > struct sk_buff; > > > struct module; > > > > > 89a95,96 > > > struct ieee80211_device; > > > > and > > > > # diff ieee80211.h /usr/src/softmac-snapshot/include/net/ieee80211.h > > 366,367c366,368 > > < * information for frames received. Not setting these will not > > cause > > < * any adverse affects. */ > > --- > > > * information for frames received. > > > * For ieee80211_rx_mgt, you need to set at least the 'len' > > parameter. > > > */ > > 1090a1092 > > > /* make sure to set stats->len */ > > 1122a1125,1132 > > > extern int ieee80211_wx_set_auth(struct net_device *dev, > > > struct iw_request_info *info, > > > union iwreq_data *wrqu, > > > char *extra); > > > extern int ieee80211_wx_get_auth(struct net_device *dev, > > > struct iw_request_info *info, > > > union iwreq_data *wrqu, > > > char *extra); > > > > > > but of also because ieee80211softmac.h simply does not exist at all in > > kernel-source. > > which must be also the explanation of getting various error messages > > (check with dmesg) > > So it is not without reason that the README file in bcm43xx states > > explicitly that you need to compile against > > SOFTMAC source and not the kernel-source made respective modules! > > > > I tried also another combination building the kernel both WITHOUT and > > WITH the ieee80211 modules > > and then built the bcm43xx against softmac-snapshot on top!!!. Then I > > noticed that > > in the first case (kernel WITHOUT ieee80211 related modules) compiling > > the bcm43xx module (I repeat against softmac-snapshot!) failed (perhaps > > due to some incompatibilities of the rest of the kernel stuff???) > > while in the second case (kernel built WITH ieee80211 related modules) > > the module did compile eventually > > because the softmac stuff essentially is "overwritting" kernel's own > > original ieee80211 stuff!!!! > > Which means that in that case the ieee80211 modules are just the > > softmac-snapshot's stuff and not the > > original kernel's !!! > > > > As a conclusion, then, I think that if someone sticks with kernel 2.6.15 > > and the softmac-snapshot source, > > there would be no problems to encounter anymore! > > > > (PS. sorry for the length of the reply, but I felt that I had to share > > all that!) > > > > best regards > > > > Emmanuel Galatoulas > > -- > Milan Toth .''`. > http://milan.toth-online.com : :' : > [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'` > `- > MATH AND ALCOHOL DON'T MIX! > Please don't drink and derive. > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >