On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 11:42 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 18:00 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > So it's bcm's fault ? Did you do a bit of analysis ? that would be > > useful... > > I kinda assumed the list was lagging again and my brother had already > posted the solution. Yes, bcm does some measuring stuff that keeps > interrupts disabled for lots of milliseconds (25 or something). It's > being fixed. > > I still think, however, that we ought to be able to deal with lost > interrupts.
Oh sure, but it's also useful to have a way to find who are the bast*rds who are causing big latencies so we can fix them :) Ben. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
