On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 09:12:19PM -0700, brian wrote: > > > --- Wolfgang Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > You can even get the very latest 2.0 version from > > experimental, with > > stressed out enough from testing, wish i had left > sarge on my g4 at this point. >From my (relatively long-gone) short, IIRC, experiences with testing: Testing isn't *that* much different from unstable, when it comes to stability. But the advantage of unstable is that the updates/fixes for packages seemed coming faster than in testing ... But yes: unstable *is* unstable ... :) People using it should bring with them lots of time, a huge package of humor, and the will to risk running the system ugly against a wall without wondering that their system really is now dead and gone and ready for repair: And if people cannot laugh about this last sentence, they probably should not install unstable. Never-ever ... :) > > > minor, but nice extra features ... works like a > > charm here, on > > unstable and KDE ...:) (although sites with > > java-script snippets still > > seem to turn up the fan here ... :) IIRC ... > > > > $ apt-cache policy firefox > > firefox: > > Installed: 1.99+2.0b1+dfsg-1 > > Candidate: 1.99+2.0b1+dfsg-1 > > i am not sure this is really 2.0 anyway, it says 1.99. *** 1: the above Firefox says this about its version: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux ppc; en-US; rv:1.8.1b1) Gecko/20060708 BonEcho/2.0b1 (Debian-1.99+2.0b1+dfsg-1) *** 2: I can see from the features it has that it's different to previous non-2.0 versions. IIRC the non-2.0 features. These new features might be minor, but I like them ... :) HTH Best Regards Wolfgang -- Wolfgang Pfeiffer: /ICQ: 286585973/ + + + /AIM: crashinglinux/ http://profiles.yahoo.com/wolfgangpfeiffer Key ID: E3037113 http://keyserver.mine.nu/pks/lookup?search=0xE3037113&fingerprint=on -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
