On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 11:02:27AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 10:44:20AM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > > I agree that the out of tree module building for MOL should be done in > > linux-modules-extra-2.6. This was the main reason why I did not > > upload the modules as well. I could not figure out how to add a module > > only for one particular arch. Is this possible at all with the current > > framework? > > Yes it is. Check spca5xx/defines.
OK that works. Is relation of *-source packages to *-modules-$kernelversion hardcoded or is there a way to have mol-modules-source as the kernel modules source package name and mol-modules-$kernelversion as the name of the binary package containing the kernel modules? I would like to have this because mol-source as the package name for the package containing only the source for the mol kernel modules is misleading. Gaudenz BTW: aurélien told me that he fixed the mailinglist configuration for pkg-mol-devel. -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
