On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 16:29 +1100, Ian Wienand wrote: > On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:06:31PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > Or if not ,what is the exact missing bit ? numactl should work on > > powerpc and is useful on it. It shouldn't be dropped just bcs there is a > > temporary build failure. > > I wish to drop it for now firstly because (and this is my fault) I > ignored for it a bit too long and the testing version is *way* out of > date. I'd like .10 in testing at least for those architectures that > support it out-of-the-box. I am happy to (and intended to) put > powerpc back in when it can work. > > > Is it the new sys_migrate_pages that isn't hooked (yet) on powerpc ? > > Yes; but worse at the moment because upstream manually calls syscall > 280, which is just wrong (this is what the current version in unstable > is doing, which is another reason to get rid of it for now). > > If you get it wired up in the kernel, and Andi fixes up libnuma I'm > happy to put it all back together again.
Andi, can you fix libnuma ? :) Ben. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
