Op 11-01-2007 om 13:24 schreef Mathew Binkley: > Frans Pop wrote: > > Since the bug report hasn't changed since my initial bug report, you may > try that. Those blades are now running RHEL 5. Debian lost its > opportunity.
Mathew Binkley filed bugreport #391451 on friday october 6th 2006. On monday october 9th, it was cloned into #391861. Both bugs where closed saturday october 21st 2006. So there were changes since the initial bug report. Details are available at http://bugs.debian.org/391861 > > Note: if you are really interested in solving this issue, I suggest we > > discontinue this useless thread and stop bothering a lot of people who > > can't help you anyway > > I am not interested in solving this "issue". As I said previously, > we're not considering Debian any more. It's a dead issue. > > What I am interested in, as a long-time Debian user, is solving the > greater issue of real-world Debian problems not being solved because > some developers have raging egos and can't get along. A more constructive way of solving "the greater issue", could have be done by asking in november a question like Bug #391451, about a kernel module, is reported as fixed. What is needed to get in the Debian installer? > Thus I am including the people who have a chance to change that. Debian > may never die as a distribution, but it's heading down the road towards > losing it's relevance because of issues like this, and that's sad. This E-mail is a reply-to-all, so we get all the karma points we deserve. > Mat Cheers Geert Stappers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
