2007/9/3, Francesco Pedrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Monday 03 September 2007, Gunther Furtado wrote: > > 2007/8/30, Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I object! Please don't lift the ban. After lifting the ban Sven has > > > clearly shown, that he did not understand why he was banned from > > > the list and that he is not willing to change his behaviour. > > > > > > Gaudenz > > > > I second that. I feel, sadly, that Sven Luther is too hurt to see > > clearly and to find a way to work inside this community. > > and, *WHY* Sven Loother is too hurt? FWIW I can see that Sven was > threated in a way that he doesn't deserve. > > As i said in my precedent mail, I don't know Sven, but for what I can > read in the archives I can't blame Sven for a bad behaviour. > > So, to all that say "The reason of the ban is obvious" I reply that *no* > I can't see a valid reason for *any* of the steps againist him, so > please be *FAIR* with users (like me) and with Sven and *EXPLAIN* in a > understandable manner what are the problem with Sven Luther, "the > reasons are obvious" isn't a good reply. > > Hi,
I am sorry because I believe I wasn't clear: I don't think Sven should be banned! I don't think debian would be better without him. What I think is that is impossible to improve the relation between Sven and the opposite party! Shortly: I don't think is possible to solve things within Debian. That is sad and that is bad but that is - IMHO - definitively true. Cheers, -- Gunther Furtado [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]