On 10/03/2016 09:14 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > You need to consider that d-i only ships radeonfb (there is another > bug report from [email protected] requesting it) about that. So the question > is really during d-i should we leave it as-is with a very low level > offb, or try to tidy up radeonfb (radeon.ko will never be part of d-i, > there is also a long thread about this).
Can you point me to the discussion regarding radeon in d-i? I would be curios to know what the problem is. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - [email protected] `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - [email protected] `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
