Roger Leigh wrote: > > How would you like gutenprint to rename its packages to work with > the new system? In terms of user-visible packages (excluding libs) > we have > > cups-driver-gutenprint > escputil > foomatic-db-gutenprint > gimp-gutenprint > gutenprint-doc > gutenprint-locales > ijsgutenprint > > i.e. there are multiple packages for different spoolers and foomatic > and GIMP. gimp-gutenprint can remain as it is. cups-driver-gutenprint, > foomatic-db-gutenprint and ijsgutenprint are the actual driver packages.
Hi Roger, and sorry for my delay in answering, (fwiw, I don't know much about gutenprint, so… Maybe Till has a better opinion on the matter.) Under my current understanding and given the fact that many of the already- named printer-driver-* are in fact cups-specific, I would only: * rename cups-driver-gutenprint to printer-driver-gutenprint, * include printer-driver-gutenprint to printer-driver-all's list of recommends, and leave the others as they currently are. Rationale being that cups- driver-gutenprint, from the descriptions of the packages, is sufficent for cups to be able to print to the supported printers. (Rationale² is also that if someone wants to support non-cups spoolers and consistent naming, they should come with proposals.) Cheers, OdyX -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
