On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Jonas Smedegaard <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12-07-24 at 06:36pm, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> I have made a past for ghostscript that will ease the debugging of >> ghostscript problem. >> >> Instead of printing numeric error ghostscript will print >> strerror(error). >> >> It is a one liner quite safe because code path is tested on dos and >> windows (please do not laugth). >> >> Now: >> * do you think this patch is worthwhile ? >> * do you think we could convince the release team to get it [1]. > > I think it sounds like a good idea, but do not see it as crucial and > prefer if you could persuade upstream to adopt it and not carry a local > patch for it.
Already patched upstream. See but about unhelful message > ...and I do not see it as important for a freeze exception, but don't > mind you trying, if you insist. Will try Bastien > > - Jonas > > -- > * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt > * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ > > [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cae2spabjbdrj-r1boshc45jijezfwzisoy1p1r_a5opmw1s...@mail.gmail.com
