"Adam D. Barratt" <[email protected]> writes: > On 2013-05-20 17:09, Russ Allbery wrote: >> Norbert Preining <[email protected]> writes: >>> On Mo, 20 Mai 2013, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>>>>>> The build deps that I have are: >>>>>> libgd2-xpm-dev | libgd2-noxpm-dev => libtiff5-dev >>>>>> libgs-dev => libtiff4-dev >>>>>> How should this work out? >>>> The situation is that you can't have both libtiff4-dev and >>>> libtiff5-dev >>>> on the build dependency chain of any two packages at the same time. >>>> For now, what you have to do instead is to have the package that >>>> requires libtiff5-dev instead build-depend on libtiff5-alt-dev. The > [...] >> It means that ghostscript needs to be updated to do what Jay says. > Or that gd needs to not tie its own transition to libtiff, and should go > back to using libtiff4 until we're ready to do the tiff transition. > Changing gs to use tiff5 just moves the problem to the next reverse > dependency (of either gs or gd). Oh, yes, good point -- I was thinking of libgs-dev using libtiff4-alt-dev and missed that it hasn't yet been introduced. (Copying the ghostscript bug so that the maintainers are aware that my advice was premature.) -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
