On 01/08/2014 12:59 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Till Kamppeter (2014-01-08 12:42:04) >> OdyX, you have split foo2zjs into printer-driver-foo2zjs and >> printer-driver-foo2zjs-common telling that you want all >> arch-independent files being shared across architectures. This saves >> some disk space in the build server infrastructure (there should be >> plenty of disk space) and on the user side it is probably without any >> benefit as nowadays no one shares a system disk partition between >> several computers (which can be of different architectures). So for me >> it looks like that it makes building and updating more complicated >> without real benefit. Or what are the real advantages? > > Just guessing here, but I believe that if aiming for multiarch > compatibility, arch-independent parts need to be shipped as a separate > package (or code patched to look in unusual locations for its data > files. >
Do we need multi-arch for packages which are not a library? Till -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
