Hello Brian Potkin, > You got exactly what I was shown.
You are right, and I just wanted to make a point how someone who want to help can start right away with all the needed information. > Do you really think reportbug would have added an imortant clue? It > was clear that my original report was based on an unstable installation. It would have shown the architecture you are working with. > It is not exactly the bug of the year, but, as far as I am concerned, > there is a misbehaviour here. I know it is present, so can choose to > not use the option. I did really not want to make you angry at me. Maybe you still can test my proposed changes in message [#36-#3] ? Kind regards, Bernhard [#36-#3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=916765#36
