Hi Jim!
On Sun, 30 Jul 2000, Jim Westveer wrote:
> However, by signing an ID, or the email, I have demonstrated
> that I do infact, possess that private key.
IIRC, it was required that you sign your application with the
key. I don't know wheter this is still true however.
yours,
peter
--
PGP encrypted messages preferred.
http://www.cosy.sbg.ac.at/~ppalfrad/
[please CC me on lists]
- Re: Fear the new maintainer process Joop Stakenborg
- Re: Fear the new maintainer process Anand Kumria
- Re: Fear the new maintainer process Wichert Akkerman
- Re: Fear the new maintainer process Christian Surchi
- Re: Fear the new maintainer process Stephen R. Gore
- Re: Fear the new maintainer process Anand Kumria
- Identification step in the current scheme (R... Taketoshi Sano
- RE: [nm-admin] Identification step in the cu... Jim Westveer
- Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the cu... Anand Kumria
- Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the cu... Wichert Akkerman
- Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the cu... Peter Palfrader
- Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the cu... Jim Westveer
- RE: [nm-admin] Identification step in the cu... Matthew Vernon
- Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the cu... Dale Scheetz
- Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the cu... Mark Brown
- Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the cu... Dale Scheetz
- Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the cu... Mark Brown
- Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the cu... An Thi-Nguyen Le
- Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the cu... Mark Brown
- Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the cu... Anand Kumria
- Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the cu... Dale Scheetz
PGP signature
