Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process)

[Peter Palfrader]

On Thu, 03 Aug 2000, Matthew Vernon wrote:

> Dale Scheetz writes:
> 
>  > I just can't understand the reluctance to satisfy this requirement except
>  > that it is viewed by some as being too hard. I cannot, for the life of me,
> 
> You've not been reading my emails then. I don't want random people
> having a copy of my passport digitised (worse still, digitised and
> signed my me). I know other people who would be unhappy about
> this. It's not necessary, so ditch it.

100% ACK.
I'm currently in the nm queue - still waiting for an AM. If the process
begins and the ID is still required I think I'ld comply. However I would
hate it, that's for sure.

                                        yours,
                                        peter

-- 
PGP encrypted messages preferred.
http://www.cosy.sbg.ac.at/~ppalfrad/
[please CC me on lists]


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]