Le Lun 21 F�vrier 2005 00:16, Matthew Palmer a �crit : > NEW would still have to be processed by hand, though -- crypto > notifications still need to be sent, and the protection provided by > two crap developers working on a package isn't not that much better > than one crap developer working on a package.
I don't agree at all. multiple signature has to be used if you have really reviewed the package. And as an XP freak, I guess you should know that cross-reading is really good for code quality. I don't understand why it shouldn't be the same for packages. And since we quite all agree that managing multiple gpg signatures is not *that* difficult, it may worth trying it, doesn't it ? -- �O� Pierre Habouzit ��O OOO http://www.madism.org
pgpivd3dYpC4i.pgp
Description: PGP signature
