Em Ter, 2005-03-15 �s 06:06, Anthony Towns escreveu: > David Schmitt wrote: > > On Monday 14 March 2005 23:57, Daniel Ruoso wrote: > >>P.S.: I'm not saying I am starting to rewrite it, but I'm considering... > > I think I can remember rumours about a major debbugs updated for > > post-sarge. > > Consider contacting debugs' maintainers first. > There's the version tracking rollout; it's a major change, don't know > that I'd call it a major "update" though. > I don't think a rewrite's the easiest way of going about what David's > proposing...
The only reason for considering a rewrite was the fact that when I opened the source code of debbugs to see what would be necessary to include bugs dependencies I saw that the code is absolutely non-modular and I actually couldn't find the way to do the proposed change, I mean, the problem is the maintainability (does this word actually exists in english?) of the code. I was thinking about an object-oriented re-implementation, using some relational database (probably mysql) to make it easier to change the behaviour of the system later. daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
