On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:48:33PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, David Nusinow wrote: > > The problem with this is that adding a lot of features to the BTS > > while it's in use for etch may not be the wisest move. The last > > thing we need is having our bug system go down because we're hacking > > on it. I can imagine a parallel BTS which is in development and can > > be used for this task. As it proves its worth for tracking the > > release, code can be moved in to mainline. > > There's really nothing stoping anyone who wants to work on the BTS (or > things depending on the BTS) from setting up their own BTS or > mirroring the BTS while they hack away. I've set up my own[1] to test > my own patches... it's really not all that difficult to do.
Yeah, I'm going to set my own up tonight and start poking around. If I can start implementing things on it, I'll just keep doing so. It pains me to give up rails' niceties, but I'd rather improve the BTS than start from scratch. If I find that I can't penetrate the code (which I doubt, it looks fine from what I've seen) then we'll see. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
