MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Regardless, I would start by accepting Gregg's offer and > using domain dispute procedures for the "removed" ones, if > we want the domain. I think the first one is the registrar at > http://www.enom.com/terms/drp.asp and this seems straightforward, > covered by 4.a., 4.b.(i) and (iv). Will the DPL dispute it, > does SPI need to, is there a better delegate or should a random > DD act?
Our trademarks are held by SPI, so I'd assume that we need to act through them. I'd suggest simply sending a cease and desist type message to the current holders before resorting to dispute resolution procedures - it generally looks better if you've tried to settle things quietly first. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
