Sven Luther wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 03:57:26AM +0100, Henning Makholm >wrote: > >>Scripsit Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>>This has the strong smell of ranking some DFSG criteria >>>above others in importance. If you want this kind of >>>distinction, I think a less discriminatory way would be to >>>flag (internally or on a central web site somewhere) each >>>package in non-free according to which parts of DFSG it >>>fails. >> >>I think it would be more manageable to flag freedoms that >>the package still does provide, for example >> >> modified-noncommercial-redistribution >> unmodified-noncommercial-redistribution >> unmodified-commercial-redistribution >> all-freedoms-in-the-gfdl >> dfsg-freedom-of-all-runnable-programs >> dfsg-freedom-of-all-main-cpu-runnable-programs > > >Euh, what are those two last ones ?
I suppose 'main', and 'main-with-non-free-firmware', respectively. > >>or preferrably some shorter names :-) > >Sven Luther > >
HTH, Massa
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
