On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 10:22:22PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 09:51:07PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote: > > Given the above I don't really see any real difference of a tarball with a > > docbook and included pictures/graphs/,... and an Openoffice doc. > > Why on earth would we want to exclude openoffice docs (provided that the > > contents is licensed freely?) > > We don't, that's the whole point. The FDL definition of 'transparent' is > so broken that it excludes OOo docs.
How does this affect distributors? --Adam -- Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
